Every frontier model in one secure workspace.
Give your staff ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, and Grok from one login. Access to every model is included in the platform, so there are no separate licenses to buy. Staff choose the right model for each task, and the same guardrails apply to all of them.
ChatGPT
Claude
Copilot
Gemini
Grok
Perplexity
Open Models
Custom Models
Included in every plan. No separate model licenses to buy.
No single vendor is best at everything.
The frontier models leapfrog each other every few months, and each is stronger at different work. With all of them in one workspace, your staff always have the best model for the job, and you never have to re-platform to get it.
The best model for each task
Staff pick the model that fits the work, whether that's drafting, analysis, or research, instead of forcing every task through one assistant.
No model licenses to buy
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, Grok, and Perplexity are included in your MultiModel plan, behind one login. There are no separate licenses to buy, renew, or manage for each.
New models, same controls
New models inherit the guardrails you have already approved, so you can assess and roll them out without a new security project or pilot.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot, side by side.
One menu lists the External models your staff ask for next to the internal and RAG models you run yourself, clearly labeled so everyone knows where their prompt is going.
- Internal and External models grouped and labeled
- Your own RAG assistants alongside commercial models
- Models provisioned by user and group
AmericaFinancial
ClaudeInternalCopilot ChatInternalGeminiInternalGrokInternalBranch Policy Q&AInternalPerplexityExternalClaude w/ Web SearchExternalCompare AI models to find the best option for your workload.
Send one prompt to several models and switch between their answers in tabs. Your staff learn which model is best for which job, and you see it in real usage data instead of vendor claims.
- One prompt, several models, one screen
- Compare responses before you use them
- Every response logged for audit
Multi
Internal
Use prompt ⌘ ↵
Summarize my notes from yesterday’s meeting with Bayside Logistics and generate a list of follow-up items with owners and due dates.
bayside-meeting-notes.docx AI can make mistakes. Verify important information with alternative sources.Key points
- Wants to refinance a $4.2M equipment loan and add a $750K revolving line for seasonal swings.
- Decision drivers: speed to close and online treasury access.
- Also talking to one competing lender, so timing matters.
Action items
| Task | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|
| Confirm underwriting timeline | Jordan Ellis | Oct 2 |
| Send term sheet | Jordan Ellis | Oct 3 |
| Send 3 yrs financials + equipment list | Bayside CFO | Oct 8 |
| Treasury demo with AP team | Priya Shah | Week of Oct 6 |
I can also draft the recap email or a CRM note from this.
Meeting summary
Bayside Logistics is looking to refinance a $4.2M equipment loan and open a $750K revolving line of credit to cover seasonal cash flow. Their CFO flagged turnaround time and online treasury access as the deciding factors, and they’re comparing us with one other lender.
Follow-up items
- Send the term sheet for the refinance and credit line — Jordan Ellis, Fri Oct 3
- Request three years of financial statements and the equipment list — Bayside CFO, Wed Oct 8
- Book a treasury management demo with their AP team — Priya Shah, next week
- Confirm underwriting timeline with credit — Jordan Ellis, Thu Oct 2
Want me to turn this into a follow-up email to the client?
Here’s a summary of your meeting with Bayside Logistics and the next steps.
Overview
Bayside is weighing us against another lender to refinance its $4.2M equipment loan and open a $750K line of credit. Winning will come down to how fast we can close and how good our online treasury tools are.
Next steps for our team
- Jordan: check the underwriting timeline with credit (Thu)
- Jordan: send the term sheet (Fri)
- Priya: set up a treasury demo for their AP team (next week)
Waiting on Bayside
- Three years of financial statements and the equipment list (Oct 8)
Tip: since speed is a deciding factor, consider sharing the underwriting timeline with the term sheet.
AI model choice: FAQ
Straight answers for CIOs, CISOs, and compliance officers evaluating AI.
Talk to usWhich AI models can our staff use?
ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini, and Grok, along with open models and the custom and RAG assistants you build yourself. You decide which of them are available, and to whom.
Do we need to buy licenses for ChatGPT, Claude, or the other models?
No. Access to every model is included in your MultiModel plan, so you don't need to buy ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, Grok, or Perplexity licenses for your staff. Everyone reaches every model you allow from one login, in the same workspace.
How do we control who can use which model?
Models are provisioned by user and group. Internal and External models are labeled in the menu so everyone knows where their prompt is going, and you can set stricter rules for External models than for the models you host yourself. See AI guardrails.
What happens when a new model is released?
New models appear in the menu as soon as your IT team adds them, and they inherit the controls you have already approved. Because every model sits in the same portal, you can assess a new model without spinning up a separate pilot for it.
Which model should we use for which job?
Different models are stronger at different work, such as drafting, analysis, or research. Staff can send one prompt to several models and compare the answers, and our guide to recommended AI models covers which model to use for common banking tasks.
See every frontier model in one menu.
Bring a few of your team's real tasks. We'll run them across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot side by side, and show you how you control which models each group can use.